12-16-2008, 11:45 PM
<!--quoteo(post=5333:date=Dec 16 2008, 10:07 PM:name=savant)-->QUOTE (savant @ Dec 16 2008, 10:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->It does bring up a good point though. If the Cubs were willing/able to bring on Peavy's $63 million, why can't they spend that on another starting pitcher that cost's no prospects? Move Marquis' contract and they can still go after a bat and a frontline starter.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yeah I agree. I'd much rather do this by a lot over the rumored Peavy deals. Lowe would be perfect at Wrigley, and he's got a ton of playoff experience. Plus, I don't wanna face him again.
Yeah I agree. I'd much rather do this by a lot over the rumored Peavy deals. Lowe would be perfect at Wrigley, and he's got a ton of playoff experience. Plus, I don't wanna face him again.
@TheBlogfines