02-03-2010, 06:36 PM
<!--quoteo(post=78489:date=Feb 3 2010, 04:25 PM:name=VanSlawAndCottoCheese)-->QUOTE (VanSlawAndCottoCheese @ Feb 3 2010, 04:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=78487:date=Feb 3 2010, 05:23 PM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Feb 3 2010, 05:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=78486:date=Feb 3 2010, 04:22 PM:name=VanSlawAndCottoCheese)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (VanSlawAndCottoCheese @ Feb 3 2010, 04:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=78485:date=Feb 3 2010, 05:18 PM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Feb 3 2010, 05:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->He wasn't being shopped, but I wouldn't doubt that had someone so inquired, Hendry would be all ears.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No doubt. But a simple absence of a trade doth not make for proof of "untrade-ability."
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I agree. This is a non-issue, and any journalist commenting on something that no one expected to happen is out to lunch pure and simple.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I concur. Let us celebrate our agreement with the adding of chocolate to milk.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img]
Is that from The Simpsons? It sounds familiar.
No doubt. But a simple absence of a trade doth not make for proof of "untrade-ability."
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I agree. This is a non-issue, and any journalist commenting on something that no one expected to happen is out to lunch pure and simple.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I concur. Let us celebrate our agreement with the adding of chocolate to milk.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img]
Is that from The Simpsons? It sounds familiar.