01-16-2010, 02:35 PM
<!--quoteo(post=76340:date=Jan 16 2010, 01:21 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Jan 16 2010, 01:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Bleacher Nation reported this three weeks ago: http://www.bleachernation.com/2009/12/29/j...jose-contreras/
Well, at least inasmuch as MLBTradeRumors is "reporting" it. Sorry - occasionally I have to pimp.
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif[/img] (tears of a clown)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
From the comments section on December 29th:
<!--quoteo-->QUOTE <!--quotec-->I see on MLBTRADETRUMORS.com that the interest in grossly over stated.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
See, that dude told you: Back in late Dec ember MLBTRADETRUMORS.com re ported that the in terest in Con treras was over stated; now, however, MLBTRADETRUMORS.com is re porting that the Cubs are in fact in terested in Con treras. You were just ahead of your time. Under stand?
Well, at least inasmuch as MLBTradeRumors is "reporting" it. Sorry - occasionally I have to pimp.
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif[/img] (tears of a clown)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
From the comments section on December 29th:
<!--quoteo-->QUOTE <!--quotec-->I see on MLBTRADETRUMORS.com that the interest in grossly over stated.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
See, that dude told you: Back in late Dec ember MLBTRADETRUMORS.com re ported that the in terest in Con treras was over stated; now, however, MLBTRADETRUMORS.com is re porting that the Cubs are in fact in terested in Con treras. You were just ahead of your time. Under stand?
One dick can poke an eye out. A hundred dicks can move mountains.
--Veryzer
--Veryzer