01-01-2010, 08:04 AM
<!--quoteo(post=73700:date=Jan 1 2010, 01:53 AM:name=BT)-->QUOTE (BT @ Jan 1 2010, 01:53 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=73697:date=Dec 31 2009, 10:22 PM:name=MW4)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MW4 @ Dec 31 2009, 10:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=73635:date=Dec 31 2009, 12:31 PM:name=BT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BT @ Dec 31 2009, 12:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->biggest depression since 1929<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No just a Recession.
There was only one depression -- Between 1929 and 1933, the gross national product of the United States decreased by 33% while the rate of unemployment increased to 25%.
We are NO WHERE Near that.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
REALLY??? THAT is what you want to argue about? The semantics of the last bad economy? really?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well, it's better than arguing over the definition of backloading. Which it totally is, by the way. But IIRC we have a metric shit ton of money coming off the books in '12 so I'm okay with it.
No just a Recession.
There was only one depression -- Between 1929 and 1933, the gross national product of the United States decreased by 33% while the rate of unemployment increased to 25%.
We are NO WHERE Near that.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
REALLY??? THAT is what you want to argue about? The semantics of the last bad economy? really?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well, it's better than arguing over the definition of backloading. Which it totally is, by the way. But IIRC we have a metric shit ton of money coming off the books in '12 so I'm okay with it.