12-31-2009, 05:14 PM
<!--quoteo(post=73652:date=Dec 31 2009, 04:09 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Dec 31 2009, 04:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=73651:date=Dec 31 2009, 04:06 PM:name=Rappster)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Rappster @ Dec 31 2009, 04:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=73628:date=Dec 31 2009, 02:06 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Dec 31 2009, 02:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->The deal is backloaded out the ass: $3 mill in 2010, $5.5 in 2011, and $6.5 in 2012.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That's not EVEN REMOTELY BAD BACKLOADING!
Stop selling your point...
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
When the third year of a three year deal is more than 100% greater than the first year, that's a whole lot of backloading.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
When the third year of the deal is only a $1.5 million deviation from the mean, I don't think it's much backloading personally.
That's not EVEN REMOTELY BAD BACKLOADING!
Stop selling your point...
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
When the third year of a three year deal is more than 100% greater than the first year, that's a whole lot of backloading.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
When the third year of the deal is only a $1.5 million deviation from the mean, I don't think it's much backloading personally.