12-29-2009, 02:00 PM
<!--quoteo(post=73239:date=Dec 29 2009, 11:28 AM:name=Scarey)-->QUOTE (Scarey @ Dec 29 2009, 11:28 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=73234:date=Dec 29 2009, 12:36 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Dec 29 2009, 12:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Also, all you people out there clamoring to build a bullpen with a bunch of no-name minor leaguers and plugging in CF with 2 guys incapable of handling it are so fucking delusional. Doing those things accomplishes what exactly?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Saves payroll for worthwile acquisitions such as a possible replacement for Derrek Lee in the future or an ace starting pitcher. You can't just pay every player on the 25 man roster. If you get a couple of guys that can play adequately for very cheap (Marmol, Marshall, Theriot, Guzman, Soto), that improves payroll flexibility. Part of the reason the Cubs don't have payroll flexibility right now is the fact that they haven't developed a lot of guys like that. I figure if you have to have mediocre players on your team, than pay them less than a million per year rather than $3.5million.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This.
Saves payroll for worthwile acquisitions such as a possible replacement for Derrek Lee in the future or an ace starting pitcher. You can't just pay every player on the 25 man roster. If you get a couple of guys that can play adequately for very cheap (Marmol, Marshall, Theriot, Guzman, Soto), that improves payroll flexibility. Part of the reason the Cubs don't have payroll flexibility right now is the fact that they haven't developed a lot of guys like that. I figure if you have to have mediocre players on your team, than pay them less than a million per year rather than $3.5million.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This.
"I'm not sure I know what ball cheese or crotch rot is, exactly -- or if there is a difference between the two. Don't post photos, please..."
- Butcher
- Butcher