Best/Worst of the decade

[Ace]

<!--quoteo(post=72446:date=Dec 19 2009, 09:13 AM:name=Rappster)-->QUOTE (Rappster @ Dec 19 2009, 09:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=72430:date=Dec 18 2009, 09:52 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Dec 18 2009, 09:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=72355:date=Dec 18 2009, 05:46 PM:name=Rappster)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Rappster @ Dec 18 2009, 05:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=72352:date=Dec 18 2009, 04:32 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Dec 18 2009, 04:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=72350:date=Dec 18 2009, 05:26 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Dec 18 2009, 05:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->There's a $2M buyout of Silva's last year in his contract. I'm assuming we won't exercise that option...<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I thought it was $24 over the next two years, including the buyout. I think Cot's recently updated - it's $23.5 over the next two, plus the buyout. So the savings are actually a scant $4.5 million.

Pa-fucking-thetic.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

In your rush to be wonderful...again...you were WRONG!

And smug.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Uh... it turned out it was WORSE than I (and several other NEWS publications) thought. Care to try again?

(how's that for smug?)
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

HA! I don't believe it...you still got it wrong.

Unreal.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

You are aware that several of the publications - including Cubs.com - are still saying that the salary relief is $6 million, right? That it took me a double-take to figure out that it's actually closer to $5 million is just fine with me.

Which, again, is worse than $6 mill.