11-20-2009, 04:13 PM
<!--quoteo(post=69794:date=Nov 20 2009, 02:02 PM:name=veryzer)-->QUOTE (veryzer @ Nov 20 2009, 02:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=69793:date=Nov 20 2009, 12:58 PM:name=Coldneck)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Coldneck @ Nov 20 2009, 12:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=69742:date=Nov 20 2009, 10:21 AM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Nov 20 2009, 10:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->in spite of all the convincing arguments scarey made about granderson, i still like crawford better. maybe i'm just blinded by .249 ave and 141 strikeouts. i hate players like that, unless they can hit 50 home runs and drive in 140. even then, i'm skeptical.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
you want to make out with me?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
i would, but your anti-cutler stance makes me think twice.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How about a reach around at the very least. I really could care less about Cutler. I just don't think he's that good. I'm not a Bears fan either.
you want to make out with me?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
i would, but your anti-cutler stance makes me think twice.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
How about a reach around at the very least. I really could care less about Cutler. I just don't think he's that good. I'm not a Bears fan either.