11-14-2009, 01:54 PM
<!--quoteo(post=69103:date=Nov 14 2009, 11:21 AM:name=Scarey)-->QUOTE (Scarey @ Nov 14 2009, 11:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Here's my problem. I agreed with the decision at the time. I KNOW that a lot of people agreed with the decision at the time. I just personally find it hard to criticize him for the decision AFTER matter when I didn't criticize him before hand. I find it hypocritical.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You and Jim could have both been wrong.
It could be a signing that didn't work out as well as it should have but was just fine on paper or it could have been a bad idea and only looked good on paper if it was loaded up with best-case-scenarios.
You're not duty-bound to say it wasn't a bad signing simply because you didn't feel that way at the time.
This is how why wars last so long.
You and Jim could have both been wrong.
It could be a signing that didn't work out as well as it should have but was just fine on paper or it could have been a bad idea and only looked good on paper if it was loaded up with best-case-scenarios.
You're not duty-bound to say it wasn't a bad signing simply because you didn't feel that way at the time.
This is how why wars last so long.