10-31-2009, 04:01 PM
<!--quoteo(post=67746:date=Oct 31 2009, 02:32 PM:name=Mikey)-->QUOTE (Mikey @ Oct 31 2009, 02:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=67743:date=Oct 31 2009, 01:23 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 31 2009, 01:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->How much would Toronto have to eat to make that even remotely palatable?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--quoteo-->QUOTE <!--quotec-->The Cubs' idea is to split the difference on monies owed -- Wells' $107 million and Bradley's $21 million for a difference of $86 million. Each team absorbs $43 million.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
So we would get Wells for 5 years, 64 million (almost 13/year)
They would get Bradley for 2 years and rid themselves of 43 million in future money
If Im reading this correctly.
<!--quoteo-->QUOTE <!--quotec-->The Cubs' idea is to split the difference on monies owed -- Wells' $107 million and Bradley's $21 million for a difference of $86 million. Each team absorbs $43 million.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
So we would get Wells for 5 years, 64 million (almost 13/year)
They would get Bradley for 2 years and rid themselves of 43 million in future money
If Im reading this correctly.