10-31-2009, 03:43 PM
<!--quoteo(post=67752:date=Oct 31 2009, 03:24 PM:name=Runnys)-->QUOTE (Runnys @ Oct 31 2009, 03:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=67746:date=Oct 31 2009, 01:32 PM:name=Mikey)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Mikey @ Oct 31 2009, 01:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=67743:date=Oct 31 2009, 01:23 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Oct 31 2009, 01:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->How much would Toronto have to eat to make that even remotely palatable?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--quoteo-->QUOTE <!--quotec-->The Cubs' idea is to split the difference on monies owed -- Wells' $107 million and Bradley's $21 million for a difference of $86 million. Each team absorbs $43 million.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That would make it a little better. That is a lot of money though.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It also doesn't make any sense. They have to divvy up $128 million total, not 86.
<!--quoteo-->QUOTE <!--quotec-->The Cubs' idea is to split the difference on monies owed -- Wells' $107 million and Bradley's $21 million for a difference of $86 million. Each team absorbs $43 million.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That would make it a little better. That is a lot of money though.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It also doesn't make any sense. They have to divvy up $128 million total, not 86.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.