10-30-2009, 12:40 PM
<!--quoteo(post=67626:date=Oct 30 2009, 11:37 AM:name=jstraw)-->QUOTE (jstraw @ Oct 30 2009, 11:37 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=67624:date=Oct 30 2009, 11:35 AM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Oct 30 2009, 11:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=67622:date=Oct 30 2009, 11:34 AM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Oct 30 2009, 11:34 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Does anyone think that a business owned by four siblings is LESS complicated to run than one ruled by a corporate CEO?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
As long as Tom is the main go-to guy, and he delegates to real baseball people, I don't think it is a problem.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I just hope they're a family that gets along well. I'd have been happier if Tom had handled the presser alone.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Why (to the second statement, not the first)?
As long as Tom is the main go-to guy, and he delegates to real baseball people, I don't think it is a problem.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I just hope they're a family that gets along well. I'd have been happier if Tom had handled the presser alone.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Why (to the second statement, not the first)?