10-02-2009, 04:00 PM
I think a better way to label the current view of stats is to not call it "stats," as if it's some new invention that Billy Beane came up with. Stats have been a huge part of baseball since long before Ty Cobb.
I think the better word is <b>context</b>. For example, in tom's example, the guy with the relatively low .750 OPS is balanced out by him being a great fielder, a spectacular base stealer, and a sterling human being. Plus, a .750 OPS put up in the Padres Petco Park translates to something like an .850 OPS if he played in Coors Field.
It's all about context, I think.
I think the better word is <b>context</b>. For example, in tom's example, the guy with the relatively low .750 OPS is balanced out by him being a great fielder, a spectacular base stealer, and a sterling human being. Plus, a .750 OPS put up in the Padres Petco Park translates to something like an .850 OPS if he played in Coors Field.
It's all about context, I think.
There's nothing better than to realize that the good things about youth don't end with youth itself. It's a matter of realizing that life can be renewed every day you get out of bed without baggage. It's tough to get there, but it's better than the dark thoughts. -Lance