09-29-2009, 02:24 PM
<!--quoteo(post=64667:date=Sep 29 2009, 01:18 PM:name=savant)-->QUOTE (savant @ Sep 29 2009, 01:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=64663:date=Sep 29 2009, 12:47 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Sep 29 2009, 12:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=64611:date=Sep 28 2009, 10:56 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Sep 28 2009, 10:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=64604:date=Sep 28 2009, 08:05 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Sep 28 2009, 08:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=64594:date=Sep 28 2009, 06:08 PM:name=Kid)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid @ Sep 28 2009, 06:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=64571:date=Sep 28 2009, 01:54 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Sep 28 2009, 01:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=64543:date=Sep 28 2009, 07:24 AM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Sep 28 2009, 07:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->if we traded him straight up for another bad contract, we shouldn't have to eat much of his salary at all.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Quite so. The idea that we'll eat at least $15M is nutso.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Unless we trade him without taking on another bad contract.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Why would we trade him to someone only willing to pick up $3M per year?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Because the number of teams looking to trade for a lunatic and pay him much money may be limited?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We shall see. I'd live with it...I just don't think we'll have to.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If we have to pick up all but $6 million, I will flip out. Get him in to counseling/anger management and roll the dice on the next two years, if that is all the salary we are able to get out of paying.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Count me among those that think that ship has sailed. There's not enough Zoloft on the planet to keep Desmond Tutu from climbing the outfield wall and killing fans if he got the business Milt would get if he returned.
Quite so. The idea that we'll eat at least $15M is nutso.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Unless we trade him without taking on another bad contract.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Why would we trade him to someone only willing to pick up $3M per year?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Because the number of teams looking to trade for a lunatic and pay him much money may be limited?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We shall see. I'd live with it...I just don't think we'll have to.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If we have to pick up all but $6 million, I will flip out. Get him in to counseling/anger management and roll the dice on the next two years, if that is all the salary we are able to get out of paying.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Count me among those that think that ship has sailed. There's not enough Zoloft on the planet to keep Desmond Tutu from climbing the outfield wall and killing fans if he got the business Milt would get if he returned.