Bradley

[jstraw]

<!--quoteo(post=64611:date=Sep 28 2009, 10:56 PM:name=Brock)-->QUOTE (Brock @ Sep 28 2009, 10:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=64604:date=Sep 28 2009, 08:05 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Sep 28 2009, 08:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=64594:date=Sep 28 2009, 06:08 PM:name=Kid)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid @ Sep 28 2009, 06:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=64571:date=Sep 28 2009, 01:54 PM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Sep 28 2009, 01:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=64543:date=Sep 28 2009, 07:24 AM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Sep 28 2009, 07:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->if we traded him straight up for another bad contract, we shouldn't have to eat much of his salary at all.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Quite so. The idea that we'll eat at least $15M is nutso.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Unless we trade him without taking on another bad contract.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Why would we trade him to someone only willing to pick up $3M per year?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Because the number of teams looking to trade for a lunatic and pay him much money may be limited?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We shall see. I'd live with it...I just don't think we'll have to.