09-21-2009, 08:42 AM
<!--quoteo(post=63834:date=Sep 21 2009, 07:26 AM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Sep 21 2009, 07:26 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=63833:date=Sep 21 2009, 08:21 AM:name=jstraw)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jstraw @ Sep 21 2009, 08:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Suddenly that little germ of info from a couple days back about the thing in Bradley's contract about ending the season on the DL and the $2M buyout for year three is not news. I still wish I knew more about that because whatever else happens for 2010, it would seem that if such a clause exists for 2011, triggering it would have made a ton of sense. Was it a mirage?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I started doing a BN write-up on this, and the rub is - he's got to still be on the DL by April 15 next year with the same injury that knocked him out this year for the 2011 buyout to pop up.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Thanks. I look forward to reading it.
I started doing a BN write-up on this, and the rub is - he's got to still be on the DL by April 15 next year with the same injury that knocked him out this year for the 2011 buyout to pop up.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Thanks. I look forward to reading it.