09-01-2009, 05:02 PM
<!--quoteo(post=60994:date=Sep 1 2009, 05:00 PM:name=rok)-->QUOTE (rok @ Sep 1 2009, 05:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Z > Wolf and still has the potential to be better than Lackey, at least in my opinion<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
But is Z at 4/72 better than Wolf at 1/5, which is what he is got this year, or Wolf at 2/18 or 3/24, which is what I think he'll get this offseason?
If they were priced similarly I'd take Z in a heartbeat.
But is Z at 4/72 better than Wolf at 1/5, which is what he is got this year, or Wolf at 2/18 or 3/24, which is what I think he'll get this offseason?
If they were priced similarly I'd take Z in a heartbeat.