09-01-2009, 03:49 PM
<!--quoteo(post=60956:date=Sep 1 2009, 03:45 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ Sep 1 2009, 03:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=60954:date=Sep 1 2009, 02:39 PM:name=Coldneck)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Coldneck @ Sep 1 2009, 02:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=60952:date=Sep 1 2009, 03:35 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Sep 1 2009, 03:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=60947:date=Sep 1 2009, 02:24 PM:name=Coldneck)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Coldneck @ Sep 1 2009, 02:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=60944:date=Sep 1 2009, 03:14 PM:name=Kid)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid @ Sep 1 2009, 03:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=60943:date=Sep 1 2009, 03:12 PM:name=Coldneck)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Coldneck @ Sep 1 2009, 03:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Can someone please answer this question. If Zambrano were a free agent, and could sign with any team today, would his contract equal 4 yr / $72M? Because that is basically the argument we are having. I think that answer is no.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That's a false analogy. If he signed a new contract this offseason, he might not get 4/72, but I think he very well might. That doesn't mean that a team, or numerous teams, wouldn't take on his contract with that left on it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
There has to be a GM that thinks Z is worth 4 yr/ 72M for him to be claimed. I don't think there is one out there. Evidently you think there are lots og GMs that feel that way. That is the only point I am trying to make with my analogy.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
For free, without trading anything to get him, to have Zambrano under control for 4 years, there would literally be 2 dozen teams putting a claim in for him at that price. To think otherwise is foolish and completely uninformed.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You are out of your mind if you think 2 dozen teams would pay that for Z with no strings attached. I will name a dozen right now that positively would not.
Pirates
Nats
Marlins
Rays
Toronto
Diamondbacks
A's
Twins
Reds
Brewers
Indians
Royals
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You are so wrong.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If you think one of those teams would put in a waiver claim on Z, much less half of them, you are the one that is [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ruby.gif[/img] .
Big time.
That's a false analogy. If he signed a new contract this offseason, he might not get 4/72, but I think he very well might. That doesn't mean that a team, or numerous teams, wouldn't take on his contract with that left on it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
There has to be a GM that thinks Z is worth 4 yr/ 72M for him to be claimed. I don't think there is one out there. Evidently you think there are lots og GMs that feel that way. That is the only point I am trying to make with my analogy.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
For free, without trading anything to get him, to have Zambrano under control for 4 years, there would literally be 2 dozen teams putting a claim in for him at that price. To think otherwise is foolish and completely uninformed.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You are out of your mind if you think 2 dozen teams would pay that for Z with no strings attached. I will name a dozen right now that positively would not.
Pirates
Nats
Marlins
Rays
Toronto
Diamondbacks
A's
Twins
Reds
Brewers
Indians
Royals
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You are so wrong.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If you think one of those teams would put in a waiver claim on Z, much less half of them, you are the one that is [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ruby.gif[/img] .
Big time.