Bradley

[veryzer]

<!--quoteo(post=60866:date=Aug 31 2009, 06:23 PM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Aug 31 2009, 06:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=60859:date=Aug 31 2009, 05:40 PM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Aug 31 2009, 05:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=60851:date=Aug 31 2009, 02:23 PM:name=Scarey)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Scarey @ Aug 31 2009, 02:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=60847:date=Aug 31 2009, 01:45 PM:name=vitaminB)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vitaminB @ Aug 31 2009, 01:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I'm not going to take the time to post responses. It's clear you just don't get it. Several points you didn't even seem to grasp. So we'll just say I'm wrong and you have way too much time on your hands.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Some of your comments were just opinions that I disagreed with. That's fine, we're allowed to disagree. If I don't get "it" than why not try showing me what "it" is and why you think it's the way to go.

Some of your comments were just wrong. I pointed that out to you and showed you why you were wrong. I'm not sure what is not being grasped here.

So, you resort to the old "I don't care enough and you do, therefor I win" defense? Why not at least try to defend your points? All it really says to anybody is "I don't know what I'm talking about, so I quit".

Honestly, I didn't mean any offense by responding to your points. I have no problems acting like a dick back to someone who wants to be smug and condescending though.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


scarey, i disagreed with half your points too, but to refute them individually is tedious and it wouldn't change your mind anyway.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

That may be true, but it doesn't necessarily need to be said in the way it was said.

(says a guy who is admittedly very smug)

(and better than all of you)
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


that's the way of the walk around these parts, son.