08-31-2009, 07:50 AM
<!--quoteo(post=60796:date=Aug 30 2009, 11:12 PM:name=BT)-->QUOTE (BT @ Aug 30 2009, 11:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=60789:date=Aug 30 2009, 08:47 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Aug 30 2009, 08:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=60784:date=Aug 30 2009, 08:25 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Aug 30 2009, 08:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=60783:date=Aug 30 2009, 09:20 PM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ Aug 30 2009, 09:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=60760:date=Aug 30 2009, 02:24 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Aug 30 2009, 02:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->The stats say Zambrano is a top five pitcher in the NL<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
They do?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sure. Not this season - over the past like 4 or 5. There was a whole big thing about it a few weeks ago.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Last 5 seasons - 3.26, 3.41, 3.95, 3.91, 3.91. Without looking it up I'd guess he isn't in the top 5 in any of those seasons, let alone all of them put together.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
5th in 2006. I'd also add that a lot more than ERA determines top 5.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm also pretty sure that if a guy is, for example, 7th in the league in ERA for each of 5 straight seasons, he's probably going to be in the top five for those 5 seasons total.
Regardless, I'm quite confident that whatever the discussion that was had here and in the media a couple months/weeks/whatever ago concluded that Z has been a top 5 pitcher in the NL over the course of the last 5, 6, however many seasons. I believe it was a Kaplan article that started the whole thing.
They do?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sure. Not this season - over the past like 4 or 5. There was a whole big thing about it a few weeks ago.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Last 5 seasons - 3.26, 3.41, 3.95, 3.91, 3.91. Without looking it up I'd guess he isn't in the top 5 in any of those seasons, let alone all of them put together.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
5th in 2006. I'd also add that a lot more than ERA determines top 5.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm also pretty sure that if a guy is, for example, 7th in the league in ERA for each of 5 straight seasons, he's probably going to be in the top five for those 5 seasons total.
Regardless, I'm quite confident that whatever the discussion that was had here and in the media a couple months/weeks/whatever ago concluded that Z has been a top 5 pitcher in the NL over the course of the last 5, 6, however many seasons. I believe it was a Kaplan article that started the whole thing.
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.