08-22-2009, 10:28 AM
<!--quoteo(post=59460:date=Aug 22 2009, 09:17 AM:name=Scarey)-->QUOTE (Scarey @ Aug 22 2009, 09:17 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=59459:date=Aug 22 2009, 09:08 AM:name=1060Ivy)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (1060Ivy @ Aug 22 2009, 09:08 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->No comparison. The '69 team was the class of the division for most of the season. The '09 team has not been viewed as the best team in the NL for most of the season and have played terribly for good portions of the season.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Are you guys even reading what jstraw is typing past the title? [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Even if the '09 Cubs loss every game in September and October, we can't match the disappointment of the '69 swoon.
Are you guys even reading what jstraw is typing past the title? [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Even if the '09 Cubs loss every game in September and October, we can't match the disappointment of the '69 swoon.