08-22-2009, 09:59 AM
<!--quoteo(post=59453:date=Aug 22 2009, 09:41 AM:name=jstraw)-->QUOTE (jstraw @ Aug 22 2009, 09:41 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->1969: We went from 8 1/2 games up to 8 games back at the end of the season. That's a 16 1/2 game swing.
2009: We went from tied for first to 7 back in just 15 days (I think). I know it'll never compare with blowing a big divisional lead but can we drop as many games in the standings as fast or faster?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
'69 is worse--doesn't matter if we lose every game from here on out.
2009: We went from tied for first to 7 back in just 15 days (I think). I know it'll never compare with blowing a big divisional lead but can we drop as many games in the standings as fast or faster?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
'69 is worse--doesn't matter if we lose every game from here on out.
I'm 100% fine with this. I'm just glad there's an actual plan in place that isn't, "Let's load up on retreads and hope we get lucky." I'm a little tired of that plan.
Butcher
Butcher