08-10-2009, 11:01 PM
<!--quoteo(post=56926:date=Aug 10 2009, 09:49 PM:name=KBwsb)-->QUOTE (KBwsb @ Aug 10 2009, 09:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->1. It is my opinion that the Cubs could have kept DeRosa and still signed Bradley. Common sense.
2. The Bradley signing has looked bad, but...I would still do it over again. Our options seemed to be Milton, or either Ibanez, Abreu or Dunn. Ibanez and Abreu have had wonderful seasons so far, but both are real old, defensive liabilities, and should be expected to decline.
Dunn is typical Dunn; he has more homers than Bradley, Fukudome and Aramis <i>combined</i>, but he sucks with the glove.
I think Milt will continue his upward progression, and be worth the 30 mil by the time all is said and done.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
1. Disagree to an extent, but certainly not worth rehashing.
2. I find it interesting that Dunn has been moved to 1B and the Nats have started winning, he had some horrendous error numbers in the OF this year.
2. The Bradley signing has looked bad, but...I would still do it over again. Our options seemed to be Milton, or either Ibanez, Abreu or Dunn. Ibanez and Abreu have had wonderful seasons so far, but both are real old, defensive liabilities, and should be expected to decline.
Dunn is typical Dunn; he has more homers than Bradley, Fukudome and Aramis <i>combined</i>, but he sucks with the glove.
I think Milt will continue his upward progression, and be worth the 30 mil by the time all is said and done.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
1. Disagree to an extent, but certainly not worth rehashing.
2. I find it interesting that Dunn has been moved to 1B and the Nats have started winning, he had some horrendous error numbers in the OF this year.