12-09-2008, 05:42 PM
<!--quoteo(post=3054:date=Dec 9 2008, 03:34 PM:name=Scarey)-->QUOTE (Scarey @ Dec 9 2008, 03:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=3030:date=Dec 9 2008, 04:09 PM:name=Sandberg)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Sandberg @ Dec 9 2008, 04:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Do we have Peavy yet?
SANDBERG<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/funny.gif[/img]
BTW, does it really make sense to go through the trouble of trading for Peavy then getting rid of Zambrano? It just seems silly to me.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Zambrano has a full no-trade clause, that part is totally fabricated.
SANDBERG<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/funny.gif[/img]
BTW, does it really make sense to go through the trouble of trading for Peavy then getting rid of Zambrano? It just seems silly to me.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Zambrano has a full no-trade clause, that part is totally fabricated.