Peavy Talk

[Butcher]

<!--quoteo(post=2922:date=Dec 9 2008, 12:59 PM:name=bz)-->QUOTE (bz @ Dec 9 2008, 12:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=2911:date=Dec 9 2008, 12:47 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Dec 9 2008, 12:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=2906:date=Dec 9 2008, 12:41 PM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Dec 9 2008, 12:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->i beieve that if you hit 40 plus home runs, you should be able to drive in more than 100 runs. dunns problem is that he hits a shitton of solo home runs and rarely if ever hits sacrifice flies or any other kind of hit for that matter.

and for the record, i said that rbi are more important than a lot of you give credit for. i'm not saying its the most important stat.

run producers produce runs. doesn't matter what kind of team they play for.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Derrek Lee hit 46 homers in 2005 and had only 107 RBIs.

Want to know why? He had fucking Neifi Perez and Corey Patterson hitting in front of him. If he had two guys that had OBP above .300 hitting in front of him, he would've had well over 120 RBI.

Obviously, sluggers and great hitters and going to get their numbers. But their RBI totals are going to fluctuate quite a bit depending on who is hitting in front of them.

It isn't really a difficult concept.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

And yet, you used this exact same instance to tell me that batting order does not matter.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
For total runs produced by a lineup, it doesn't. For individual RBI totals, it does (but that isn't what we were talking about).

Nice try, though.