07-30-2009, 03:16 PM
<!--quoteo(post=53802:date=Jul 30 2009, 02:15 PM:name=KBwsb)-->QUOTE (KBwsb @ Jul 30 2009, 02:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=53766:date=Jul 30 2009, 02:00 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jul 30 2009, 02:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Anyone who thinks Pujols isn't/hasn't juicing/juiced has their head in the sand. Or is a Cardinals fan.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well, how is he hiding it, when nobody else seems to be able to do that.
And if he had done it years earlier, but now is off the juice, why is he now having his best season?
Considering his Garvey/Ripken-esque image as the pleasant/good-guy/deeply Christian family man, he'd have a LOT more to lose than other guys. (was anyone surprised when Ortiz was fingered? Many people just laughed off Manny's test results. With Pujols, it'd be a much bigger deal if he was caught).
Canseco had been calling out A-Rod for years before the debacle went down. Has anyone with any credibility called out Pujols?
I hate defending the fuckhead, but he <i>could</i> just be a phenomenal player, like Hank Aaron or something.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
because there is no testing for HGH. hope that answers your question.
Well, how is he hiding it, when nobody else seems to be able to do that.
And if he had done it years earlier, but now is off the juice, why is he now having his best season?
Considering his Garvey/Ripken-esque image as the pleasant/good-guy/deeply Christian family man, he'd have a LOT more to lose than other guys. (was anyone surprised when Ortiz was fingered? Many people just laughed off Manny's test results. With Pujols, it'd be a much bigger deal if he was caught).
Canseco had been calling out A-Rod for years before the debacle went down. Has anyone with any credibility called out Pujols?
I hate defending the fuckhead, but he <i>could</i> just be a phenomenal player, like Hank Aaron or something.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
because there is no testing for HGH. hope that answers your question.
Wang.