12-09-2008, 12:41 PM
<!--quoteo(post=2826:date=Dec 9 2008, 09:39 AM:name=sleepyhead)-->QUOTE (sleepyhead @ Dec 9 2008, 09:39 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=2823:date=Dec 9 2008, 10:36 AM:name=BT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BT @ Dec 9 2008, 10:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=2817:date=Dec 9 2008, 10:30 AM:name=sleepyhead)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (sleepyhead @ Dec 9 2008, 10:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Is there even a slight chance that an RBI discussion thread could be created for all this?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Is it REALLY freaking you out that much? If you see the terms "dunn" or "rbi", skip the post.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It's annoying when you are at work and look at the peavy thread and there are two new pages and all that happened is non-Peavy talk.
Don't see why it's that big a deal to take a discussion that has absolutely nothing to do with Jake Peavy to a different thread.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
:coachcur:
Is it REALLY freaking you out that much? If you see the terms "dunn" or "rbi", skip the post.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It's annoying when you are at work and look at the peavy thread and there are two new pages and all that happened is non-Peavy talk.
Don't see why it's that big a deal to take a discussion that has absolutely nothing to do with Jake Peavy to a different thread.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
:coachcur: