07-29-2009, 09:25 PM
<!--quoteo(post=53431:date=Jul 29 2009, 08:18 PM:name=Coach)-->QUOTE (Coach @ Jul 29 2009, 08:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=53399:date=Jul 29 2009, 07:21 PM:name=dk123)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (dk123 @ Jul 29 2009, 07:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I don't see what's so fucking complicated. I don't think anybody thinks that the squeeze was the best option in terms of the percentages. Lou took a calculated risk that didn't pan out. It was a risky move, not a retarded one. If it had panned out, he would have looked great, and since it didn't, he looks bad. Basically, of all the possible outcomes, the worst one occurred...that is partially on Fontenot, and partially on Lou for calling the play. In the end, this debate seems to come down to whether you should always play the percentages, and obviously, there will be disagreement about that.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Absolutely
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Again, as I said in the other thread, this isn't even factoring in using Fontenot instead of Fox burned a bench spot for no reason since Fox had to come into the game anyway. This just adds another layer of stupid to Lou's decision.
Absolutely
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Again, as I said in the other thread, this isn't even factoring in using Fontenot instead of Fox burned a bench spot for no reason since Fox had to come into the game anyway. This just adds another layer of stupid to Lou's decision.