07-29-2009, 11:52 AM
<!--quoteo(post=53074:date=Jul 29 2009, 10:46 AM:name=Sandberg)-->QUOTE (Sandberg @ Jul 29 2009, 10:46 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <!--quotec-->Now, the question, and the reason why I chuckled, is, “Would you ever exercise a squeeze with anything but a single runner on third, <b>unless the other runners didn’t count, like in a tie game in the bottom of the 9th or later</b>?” The answer is no (although I suppose it is possible to occasionally be correct).<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not sure if you realized this, but the whole analysis is based on it not being the bottom of the 9th in a tie game.
It is good analysis, and it was an interesting read, but not applicable to the other night.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yeah, why does it matter that the bases were loaded, considering it was the bottom of the 9th in a tie game?
I'm not sure if you realized this, but the whole analysis is based on it not being the bottom of the 9th in a tie game.
It is good analysis, and it was an interesting read, but not applicable to the other night.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yeah, why does it matter that the bases were loaded, considering it was the bottom of the 9th in a tie game?