07-26-2009, 05:46 PM
<!--quoteo(post=52169:date=Jul 26 2009, 03:38 PM:name=Beams)-->QUOTE (Beams @ Jul 26 2009, 03:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->trading Kershaw would be heavy, no doubt, but if they found a way to pull it off by keeping him and Billingsley, they'd be nigh unstoppable.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I can't see them giving up Kershaw in that deal. He has a 0.93 ERA over his last 8 starts and is only going to improve as a pitcher. If you're giving up Kershaw, you better be getting a Halladay or Haren in return. I understand Victor's a stud himself, but giving up Loney and more along with Kershaw... I don't see that as a wise decision for the Dodgers organization going forward. It probably makes them better this year, but could really comeback to haunt them down the road.
I can't see them giving up Kershaw in that deal. He has a 0.93 ERA over his last 8 starts and is only going to improve as a pitcher. If you're giving up Kershaw, you better be getting a Halladay or Haren in return. I understand Victor's a stud himself, but giving up Loney and more along with Kershaw... I don't see that as a wise decision for the Dodgers organization going forward. It probably makes them better this year, but could really comeback to haunt them down the road.
@TheBlogfines