07-21-2009, 09:17 PM
<!--quoteo(post=51056:date=Jul 21 2009, 07:16 PM:name=Coach)-->QUOTE (Coach @ Jul 21 2009, 07:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=51047:date=Jul 21 2009, 08:18 PM:name=ColoradoCub)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ColoradoCub @ Jul 21 2009, 08:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=51042:date=Jul 21 2009, 05:55 PM:name=Coach)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Coach @ Jul 21 2009, 05:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->A lottery can also encourage tanking to get better chances at the #1 pick, as it happens in the NBA often.
If teams get out of it early, they will quit.
So what is going to happen to the money pot if someone doesn't pay?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I would think that money would be a bigger incentive over tanking for draft picks.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
After re-reading your post, you propose a draft lottery where the middle teams have more of an advantage over everyone else? I've never heard of one like that, but it could work.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yeah, that's the idea at least.
If teams get out of it early, they will quit.
So what is going to happen to the money pot if someone doesn't pay?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I would think that money would be a bigger incentive over tanking for draft picks.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
After re-reading your post, you propose a draft lottery where the middle teams have more of an advantage over everyone else? I've never heard of one like that, but it could work.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yeah, that's the idea at least.