07-10-2009, 05:11 PM
<!--quoteo(post=49263:date=Jul 10 2009, 04:10 PM:name=BT)-->QUOTE (BT @ Jul 10 2009, 04:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=49260:date=Jul 10 2009, 04:08 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jul 10 2009, 04:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=49257:date=Jul 10 2009, 04:05 PM:name=BT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BT @ Jul 10 2009, 04:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->is the fact that Fontenot has more strikeouts than hits a good thing or a bad thing?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Giving Fontenot the job at 2B while trading DeRosa so we could get more left-handed will go down as one of the dumbest things Jim Hendry has ever done in his life.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That's only part of what he did. He did it to sign Bradley as well.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I actually thought Bradley was a good risk. But it had nothing to do with Fontenot and DeRosa.
Giving Fontenot the job at 2B while trading DeRosa so we could get more left-handed will go down as one of the dumbest things Jim Hendry has ever done in his life.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That's only part of what he did. He did it to sign Bradley as well.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I actually thought Bradley was a good risk. But it had nothing to do with Fontenot and DeRosa.