07-10-2009, 09:44 AM
He was pretty good as a LH batter, but he was still better RH.
2008:
LH vs RHP - .940
RH vs LHP - 1.127
2007:
LH vs RHP - .937
RH vs LHP - .966
So I don't know if it's just a matter of hitting LHP better or if it's a combo of being a better overall hitter while batting as RH.
2008:
LH vs RHP - .940
RH vs LHP - 1.127
2007:
LH vs RHP - .937
RH vs LHP - .966
So I don't know if it's just a matter of hitting LHP better or if it's a combo of being a better overall hitter while batting as RH.
I got nothin'.
Andy
Andy