Peavy Talk

[Scarey]

<!--quoteo(post=2027:date=Dec 7 2008, 05:45 PM:name=bz)-->QUOTE (bz @ Dec 7 2008, 05:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=2025:date=Dec 7 2008, 04:24 PM:name=Scarey)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Scarey @ Dec 7 2008, 04:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=1904:date=Dec 7 2008, 01:17 PM:name=savant)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (savant @ Dec 7 2008, 01:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Come on Scarey, you can join us in the 21st century now.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I'm not sure what you mean here.

I'm a firm believer in RBIs. I know RBIs are dependent on players getting on ahead, and also the baserunning ability of those players. But, I think RBIs usually will separate the players when compared. It's not a be all end all, but I think it's a good rule of thumb.

I think it's certainly a better measuring stick then HRs.

<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Measuring stick for what?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

For how good a player is. I thought that was fairly obvious.