06-14-2009, 11:45 PM
<!--quoteo(post=44162:date=Jun 14 2009, 11:40 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 14 2009, 11:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44161:date=Jun 14 2009, 10:38 PM:name=Kid)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid @ Jun 14 2009, 10:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44158:date=Jun 14 2009, 11:35 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 14 2009, 11:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44157:date=Jun 14 2009, 10:29 PM:name=Baron)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Baron @ Jun 14 2009, 10:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44156:date=Jun 14 2009, 10:22 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 14 2009, 10:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Fontenot still blows. And DeRosa is starting to look pretty good. That's all.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
.306/.395/.444/.839
.326/.392/.500/.892
June stats, 10 AB difference.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
June stats? We're 14 days into the month. How many games is that?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Fontenot "still" blows. DeRosa is "starting" to look good. Doesn't that imply you're talking about recent results?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I should've just posted their season stats to date, I guess.
DeRosa's overall stats are looking good, while Fontenot's have yet to look good at any point this season.
Better?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Makes more sense, but is now the time to complain? It seems at least possible that Fontenot has turned it around, right? You're talking almost 20% of his at bats this season in June.
.306/.395/.444/.839
.326/.392/.500/.892
June stats, 10 AB difference.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
June stats? We're 14 days into the month. How many games is that?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Fontenot "still" blows. DeRosa is "starting" to look good. Doesn't that imply you're talking about recent results?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I should've just posted their season stats to date, I guess.
DeRosa's overall stats are looking good, while Fontenot's have yet to look good at any point this season.
Better?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Makes more sense, but is now the time to complain? It seems at least possible that Fontenot has turned it around, right? You're talking almost 20% of his at bats this season in June.
This is not some silly theory that's unsupported and deserves being mocked by photos of Xena.