06-14-2009, 11:38 PM
<!--quoteo(post=44158:date=Jun 14 2009, 11:35 PM:name=Butcher)-->QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 14 2009, 11:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44157:date=Jun 14 2009, 10:29 PM:name=Baron)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Baron @ Jun 14 2009, 10:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=44156:date=Jun 14 2009, 10:22 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Jun 14 2009, 10:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Fontenot still blows. And DeRosa is starting to look pretty good. That's all.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
.306/.395/.444/.839
.326/.392/.500/.892
June stats, 10 AB difference.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
June stats? We're 14 days into the month. How many games is that?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Fontenot "still" blows. DeRosa is "starting" to look good. Doesn't that imply you're talking about recent results?
.306/.395/.444/.839
.326/.392/.500/.892
June stats, 10 AB difference.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
June stats? We're 14 days into the month. How many games is that?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Fontenot "still" blows. DeRosa is "starting" to look good. Doesn't that imply you're talking about recent results?
This is not some silly theory that's unsupported and deserves being mocked by photos of Xena.