06-10-2009, 09:04 AM
<!--quoteo(post=43415:date=Jun 10 2009, 07:38 AM:name=rok)-->QUOTE (rok @ Jun 10 2009, 07:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=43414:date=Jun 10 2009, 07:25 AM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Jun 10 2009, 07:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->it's funny, we all knew signing bradley was a gamble, even those of us in favor of the deal thought it was a gmable, but did anyone think it would be because he can't hit? we knew the injury history was going to be a problem, but his suckiness at the plate? i never saw that coming. should have, but didn't.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That's exactly why the guy upsets me so much. I knew he'd miss time, but I assumed that we'd want him back in the lineup badly each time he'd get injured. He must be so messed up in the head right now.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It's also been a handed thing and a road thing. His splits batting right handed (.294/.385/.471) are good and his splits at home(.269/.367/.500) are good. So if we can just get him to only bat right handed and only play home games, we should be set.
That's exactly why the guy upsets me so much. I knew he'd miss time, but I assumed that we'd want him back in the lineup badly each time he'd get injured. He must be so messed up in the head right now.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It's also been a handed thing and a road thing. His splits batting right handed (.294/.385/.471) are good and his splits at home(.269/.367/.500) are good. So if we can just get him to only bat right handed and only play home games, we should be set.