DeRosa Traded to Indians

[veryzer]

<!--quoteo(post=40838:date=May 28 2009, 03:34 PM:name=Clapp)-->QUOTE (Clapp @ May 28 2009, 03:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=40836:date=May 28 2009, 02:28 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ May 28 2009, 02:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=40830:date=May 28 2009, 03:05 PM:name=leonardsipes)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (leonardsipes @ May 28 2009, 03:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=40829:date=May 28 2009, 01:55 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ May 28 2009, 01:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->If Aramis didn't dislocate his shoulder, and Fontenot and Bradley had the stats that they will at the end of the year, people wouldn't be talking about this.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Yes, but that would not have made the move any smarter. There is no explanation that makes the move a good one.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yessir.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The team did have to get more left-handed. You guys can believe otherwise all you want, but you need balance in a lineup. Unfortunately, trading DeRosa was the only one to really allow that to happen. I didn't like the move at first, but only because of his versatility to the ballclub, and that turned out to not matter one bit.
I'm not gonna explain all this anymore as I spent a good 2 hours writing about it last night. Have at it if you want.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


absotutely.