05-19-2009, 10:21 AM
<!--quoteo(post=38645:date=May 19 2009, 07:59 AM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ May 19 2009, 07:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=38639:date=May 19 2009, 07:38 AM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ May 19 2009, 07:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->moving teams is only part of the answer. there are teams that need to be contracted first. moving the expos to washington was the first mistake. that team should have just disappeared.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Contracting teams isn't gonna even out the divisions, unless they go back to a 2 league, 2 division system. I don't see how contracting teams does anything positive.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
three 4 team divisions in each league. i'm pretty sure we can come up with 6 teams that need to go. less teams means more competitive leagues. that's a positive, right?
Contracting teams isn't gonna even out the divisions, unless they go back to a 2 league, 2 division system. I don't see how contracting teams does anything positive.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
three 4 team divisions in each league. i'm pretty sure we can come up with 6 teams that need to go. less teams means more competitive leagues. that's a positive, right?
Wang.