12-04-2008, 09:16 AM
<!--quoteo(post=1185:date=Dec 4 2008, 07:13 AM:name=Ace)-->QUOTE (Ace @ Dec 4 2008, 07:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->I've never understood the collusion argument in this context. If a team really wants a player, does anyone actually believe they'll pass on signing him because they've "agreed" not to outbid the lowball offer of another team? Please.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The entire league agreed not to offer Barry Bonds a contract last year, so I don't really think it's that far of a stretch. Hasn't the league been found guilty of collusion before?
The entire league agreed not to offer Barry Bonds a contract last year, so I don't really think it's that far of a stretch. Hasn't the league been found guilty of collusion before?