05-08-2009, 05:26 PM
<!--quoteo(post=36464:date=May 8 2009, 04:24 PM:name=Baron)-->QUOTE (Baron @ May 8 2009, 04:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=36461:date=May 8 2009, 04:23 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ May 8 2009, 04:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=36459:date=May 8 2009, 04:21 PM:name=Baron)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Baron @ May 8 2009, 04:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Wait, people are upset about this? Really??<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It isn't a bad thing -- but it does accentuate the ridiculousness of the DeRosa trade.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No, no, no, no, no. Notice how with Freel, Fontenot is still the 2B, would not have been with DeRosa.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I don't really feel like illustrating how DeRosa and Fontenot could both get plenty of ABs on this team again...
It isn't a bad thing -- but it does accentuate the ridiculousness of the DeRosa trade.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No, no, no, no, no. Notice how with Freel, Fontenot is still the 2B, would not have been with DeRosa.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I don't really feel like illustrating how DeRosa and Fontenot could both get plenty of ABs on this team again...