05-04-2009, 12:02 PM
<!--quoteo(post=35308:date=May 4 2009, 11:00 AM:name=Brock)-->QUOTE (Brock @ May 4 2009, 11:00 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=35303:date=May 4 2009, 10:52 AM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ May 4 2009, 10:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=35290:date=May 4 2009, 10:02 AM:name=Brock)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brock @ May 4 2009, 10:02 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Is Miles also providing what DeRosa did last season? Because although Fontenot took over as the everyday 2B, essentially Miles replaced DeRosa on the roster.
DeRosa + Fontenot >>>> Fontenot + Miles<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No, for the 1,000,000 time, no. It's Bradley, Fontenot, Miles > Edmonds, DeRosa, Fontenot. There was never, ever gonna be a roster with both DeRosa and Bradley on it, it was never an option.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I could have maybe agreed with that until I saw the way we pissed away money for nothing with guys like Gaudin and Marquis/Vizcaino. What was the actual savings in having Miles instead of DeRosa? $3 million or so?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
DeRosa had one year left at $5M. We signed Miles for $5M over two seasons. So, we saved $2.5M.
DeRosa + Fontenot >>>> Fontenot + Miles<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No, for the 1,000,000 time, no. It's Bradley, Fontenot, Miles > Edmonds, DeRosa, Fontenot. There was never, ever gonna be a roster with both DeRosa and Bradley on it, it was never an option.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I could have maybe agreed with that until I saw the way we pissed away money for nothing with guys like Gaudin and Marquis/Vizcaino. What was the actual savings in having Miles instead of DeRosa? $3 million or so?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
DeRosa had one year left at $5M. We signed Miles for $5M over two seasons. So, we saved $2.5M.