Injury Log on the Big 3

[kbwsb]

<!--quoteo(post=34443:date=Apr 30 2009, 09:39 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ Apr 30 2009, 09:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=34438:date=Apr 30 2009, 09:34 PM:name=KBwsb)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (KBwsb @ Apr 30 2009, 09:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=34320:date=Apr 30 2009, 04:52 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Apr 30 2009, 04:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=34286:date=Apr 30 2009, 03:44 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Apr 30 2009, 03:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=34232:date=Apr 30 2009, 01:00 PM:name=KBwsb)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (KBwsb @ Apr 30 2009, 01:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->DeRosa>Scales

(to the 90th power)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
What point is this supposed to prove, I don't follow.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

That if the Cubs hadn't traded DeRosa, he could back up at third, I believe is the point.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Thank you Ace, for pointing out the obvious. Of course, nobody could have possibly predicted that Bradley and/or Aramis would get hurt this year. Therefore Ruby is right yet again...good trade.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Hey dumbass, it was DeRosa or Bradley, there was never a possibility that both would be on the same team.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yep, that was the exact equation.
It's especially wonderful now that we've <i>eaten</i> $6 mil in contracts for Vizcaino and Gaudin.
Fine budget planning. But what do I know? I'm just a dumb fan who thinks it's good to have suitable backups for oft-injured players. What a dumbass! Good call!