Dunn vs. Bradley (so far)

[Butcher]

<!--quoteo(post=34177:date=Apr 30 2009, 10:06 AM:name=Runnys)-->QUOTE (Runnys @ Apr 30 2009, 10:06 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=34176:date=Apr 30 2009, 10:01 AM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Apr 30 2009, 10:01 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Nobody was talking about anything. I started this thread and now we have seven pages of discussion.

Excuse the shit out of me for trying to liven it up in here.

If everyone hates the Dunn discussions so much, feel free to start another thread, or ignore the Dunn thread. It isn't complicated.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->


But it isn't 7 pages of discussion....it is 7 pages of the same bullshit we have had 10 other times in the past 6 months, in reality, it is probably about 100 pages of pointless discussion.

Sorry, I just think dealing in hypotheticals is a waste of time because things are the way they are, they aren't going to change.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I enjoy the conversation and I enjoy dealing in the "what-ifs." It's relevant to me because there were several left-handed outfielders available in the offseason (Bradley, Dunn, Abreu, and Ibanez). Why can't we talk about the offseason decisions Hendry made? Why was Dunn not even considered and Bradley was the top of the list? Why didn't Hendry pursue Ibanez or Abreu? Are these not relevant questions?

Seriously. It isn't hard to *not* click on this thread if you aren't interested in it.