04-25-2009, 02:59 PM
<!--quoteo(post=33074:date=Apr 25 2009, 02:07 PM:name=ruby23)-->QUOTE (ruby23 @ Apr 25 2009, 02:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33072:date=Apr 25 2009, 01:04 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Apr 25 2009, 01:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33071:date=Apr 25 2009, 02:03 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Apr 25 2009, 02:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33069:date=Apr 25 2009, 01:02 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Apr 25 2009, 01:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33067:date=Apr 25 2009, 01:59 PM:name=ruby23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ruby23 @ Apr 25 2009, 01:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33065:date=Apr 25 2009, 12:39 PM:name=Ace)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ace @ Apr 25 2009, 12:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=33064:date=Apr 25 2009, 01:31 PM:name=Runnys)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Runnys @ Apr 25 2009, 01:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->BTW...when do we find a spot for Fox on this team....or when do we trade him for something our system needs.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
*dreaming of a Hoffpauir/Fox platoon at 1B, which would probably be productive enough to make up for the loss of defense*
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think no.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Did I mention it would be $10 mill cheaper?
Peavy/Hoffpauir/Fox >>>>>>>> Lee.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
When are we trading Lee for Peavy?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We're not. Just giving an example of what the saved $10 mill could provide.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->But it's not even close to an accurate depiction. It'd be more like Peavy/Hoffpauir/Fox < Lee/Vitters/Samardzija/Marshall
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Maybe it's a misrepresentation, but all I'm saying is in terms of what the ML team could look like for the same green. Your comparison sort of turns it apples/oranges.
The actual trade for Peavy is sort of beside the point. But for clarity, let me rephrase:
Hoffpauir/Fox/$10 mill to use on the ML team >>>>>>> Lee
*dreaming of a Hoffpauir/Fox platoon at 1B, which would probably be productive enough to make up for the loss of defense*
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think no.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Did I mention it would be $10 mill cheaper?
Peavy/Hoffpauir/Fox >>>>>>>> Lee.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
When are we trading Lee for Peavy?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We're not. Just giving an example of what the saved $10 mill could provide.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->But it's not even close to an accurate depiction. It'd be more like Peavy/Hoffpauir/Fox < Lee/Vitters/Samardzija/Marshall
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Maybe it's a misrepresentation, but all I'm saying is in terms of what the ML team could look like for the same green. Your comparison sort of turns it apples/oranges.
The actual trade for Peavy is sort of beside the point. But for clarity, let me rephrase:
Hoffpauir/Fox/$10 mill to use on the ML team >>>>>>> Lee
Cubs News and Rumors at Bleacher Nation.