04-23-2009, 04:06 PM
<!--quoteo(post=32588:date=Apr 23 2009, 03:05 PM:name=Clapp)-->QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 23 2009, 03:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=32582:date=Apr 23 2009, 02:03 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Apr 23 2009, 02:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=32577:date=Apr 23 2009, 03:00 PM:name=Clapp)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Clapp @ Apr 23 2009, 03:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->[quote name='Butcher' e
Because 42 at bats tells a lot more than his 477 at bats the last 2 years.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
He's never been knighted as the full-time 2B before.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I don't think Fontenot's the type that is going to let that really make a difference on his performance at the plate. Certainly hasn't in the field. It's insane to put so much into statistics of the first month of the season.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
First month? We haven't even played 20 games and people think Fontenot and Bradley are toast.
Because 42 at bats tells a lot more than his 477 at bats the last 2 years.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
He's never been knighted as the full-time 2B before.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I don't think Fontenot's the type that is going to let that really make a difference on his performance at the plate. Certainly hasn't in the field. It's insane to put so much into statistics of the first month of the season.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
First month? We haven't even played 20 games and people think Fontenot and Bradley are toast.