04-07-2009, 03:53 PM
<!--quoteo(post=28094:date=Apr 7 2009, 02:50 PM:name=veryzer)-->QUOTE (veryzer @ Apr 7 2009, 02:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=28074:date=Apr 7 2009, 02:38 PM:name=rok)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rok @ Apr 7 2009, 02:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=28026:date=Apr 7 2009, 12:50 PM:name=veryzer)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (veryzer @ Apr 7 2009, 12:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->i don't do 160 anymore. i've become a snob.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Same here, but 160 is all that's available right now, and it will tide me over until the lossless rips become available in a week or so.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
whoa! lossless? i can't afford to be that snobby. i try to get everything in 256-320 if possible. thats the best i can do in these trying times.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well, VBR is what I normally shoot for, but 320 is good if available. The problem with 320 is that the files take up too much hard drive space.
Same here, but 160 is all that's available right now, and it will tide me over until the lossless rips become available in a week or so.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
whoa! lossless? i can't afford to be that snobby. i try to get everything in 256-320 if possible. thats the best i can do in these trying times.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well, VBR is what I normally shoot for, but 320 is good if available. The problem with 320 is that the files take up too much hard drive space.