03-25-2009, 03:06 PM
<!--quoteo(post=24867:date=Mar 25 2009, 09:40 AM:name=VanSlawAndCottoCheese)-->QUOTE (VanSlawAndCottoCheese @ Mar 25 2009, 09:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=24862:date=Mar 25 2009, 11:15 AM:name=Fella)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Fella @ Mar 25 2009, 11:15 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->But I have no problem with postseason performance and championships being used as a factor for a borderline guy.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I buy this okay. So, how much better would Kevin Brown's post-season stats (6-2, 4.19, 71K/31BB) need to be to get him in the Hall? Would he need to have gotten the win in a game 7?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not saying there should be a specific cutoff point or that a voter should sit and say "hmmm, Brown had two game 6 wins and a 4.19 ERA, too bad.... if he had a 3.4 ERA and game 7 wins then he is in!"
I'm just saying if a guy is borderline and a voter is trying to decide, I think the fact that Schilling won 3 rings and had amazing postseason numbers should be a factor.
I buy this okay. So, how much better would Kevin Brown's post-season stats (6-2, 4.19, 71K/31BB) need to be to get him in the Hall? Would he need to have gotten the win in a game 7?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm not saying there should be a specific cutoff point or that a voter should sit and say "hmmm, Brown had two game 6 wins and a 4.19 ERA, too bad.... if he had a 3.4 ERA and game 7 wins then he is in!"
I'm just saying if a guy is borderline and a voter is trying to decide, I think the fact that Schilling won 3 rings and had amazing postseason numbers should be a factor.