03-24-2009, 01:53 PM
<!--quoteo(post=24723:date=Mar 24 2009, 12:50 PM:name=Scarey)-->QUOTE (Scarey @ Mar 24 2009, 12:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=24720:date=Mar 24 2009, 01:47 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Mar 24 2009, 01:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=24719:date=Mar 24 2009, 12:44 PM:name=Scarey)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Scarey @ Mar 24 2009, 12:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->
I don't buy that a team struggling to fill out a rotation spot is going to let go of a player that they just acquired by giving up a starting pitcher. Maybe it's just a backwards way of thinking, but to me it doesn't make much sense.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Maybe they were expecting Pie to be good.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Because clearly, 38 spring training bats has shown them that he's not, right?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That, plus the fact that he has sucked ass every time he's been given a shot with the big club.
I don't buy that a team struggling to fill out a rotation spot is going to let go of a player that they just acquired by giving up a starting pitcher. Maybe it's just a backwards way of thinking, but to me it doesn't make much sense.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Maybe they were expecting Pie to be good.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Because clearly, 38 spring training bats has shown them that he's not, right?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That, plus the fact that he has sucked ass every time he's been given a shot with the big club.