02-11-2009, 05:57 PM
<!--quoteo(post=17391:date=Feb 11 2009, 03:45 PM:name=Fella)-->QUOTE (Fella @ Feb 11 2009, 03:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec--><!--quoteo(post=17383:date=Feb 11 2009, 02:29 PM:name=Butcher)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Butcher @ Feb 11 2009, 02:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->You could certainly make an argument that 2/20 for Dunn is a better deal than 3/30 for Bradley. Dunn is good for 160 games a season. Who knows what we'll get from Bradley.
If Bradley plays 140 or more games, there's no question that Bradley is the better player. But we'll be incredibly lucky if we get even 120 games from Bradley.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If we only get 120 a year out of him it will only be a 2/18 contract. The 3rd year is 12 million and he only gets it if he stays healthy.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Is 120 the number? I knew there's a provision in his contract for health, but I didn't know what the number is...
If Bradley plays 140 or more games, there's no question that Bradley is the better player. But we'll be incredibly lucky if we get even 120 games from Bradley.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If we only get 120 a year out of him it will only be a 2/18 contract. The 3rd year is 12 million and he only gets it if he stays healthy.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Is 120 the number? I knew there's a provision in his contract for health, but I didn't know what the number is...